We had better see if we have a little more sense, who does what, and we shot another nightmare. Once we understand that war is always the result of criminal conduct of individuals and groups, we can begin to decipher the mystery of the war. We begin to understand what these criminals have to win and the goals and objectives that lead them.

Our lives, our children’s lives and the future of our civilization depends entirely on us at the arrival of such an understanding and to teach us to achieve the objectives of our anger, not our family, goodwill, but the small minority, even for their profits, slow the survival of their beneficiaries.

We can not to such an effort. We can vote for listening to the voices of unreason, the pilot of war and terrorists, all pursuing the same objective: the human conflicts. You all the hard work arouses in us the fear and anger that we are going to abandon that behavior motivated. We can deceive itself, these men once again and led by our nose rings corrupt in their wickedness.

But thousands of years to come, we teach that it is not a great success. If we did, we all suffered the consequences. So next time try to Kick-off loonies, why not just skip?

We can choose to do something else for the often fatal agonized margins of our ancestors. We can deny those suckered, and the reason we conduct vis-à-vis our fellow humans and efforts to increase our understanding of how and why we have lied, manipulated, angry and terrified Maybe we can finally that agonized historical model madness and civilization safe, more than five minutes before we convince some mothers in the air to chase away.

If one is in favor of the long-term survival of the entire human community, must therefore support the implementation of the basis of all the problems of human relations, because the base is the only means of survival of each problem was solved more and more can be solved.

This is not a problem of human relations that can not be resolved from the core. War can only occur if the application of reason is to avoid, and we are witnesses of fever efforts of various groups to prevent criminal enforcement.

To the extent that we forsake reason, it will not survive.

Man’s main enemy is not other men: IT IS unreason

One by the government of a free state and freedom of the protection of their citizens to avoid the violation of these rights. The approach of the government abusing its power, not the protection of rights, unless, is not new. In 1215, King John, the Magna Carta, a document on the protection of civilians in the English crown to the policy. Even the American colonies had similar projects, but the bill has been distorted because it does not anchor all rights.

After America gained its independence, Articles of Confederation was in the Constitution, but not sufficiently clear, the role played by the central government regarding human rights. George Washington was formed as the first president of the United States, April 30 1789. Like him, many other fathers as Thomas Jefferson called for a law that guarantees individual liberties of people. Therefore, the need for the Bill of Rights “was born.

James Madison, an American politician and fourth President of the United States (1809-1817) is known the “father of the Constitution.” After studying politics and people’s needs, he came with 42 rights it believes that people to protect themselves. However, by the time the Bill of Rights “was the Constitution, on the 5th December 10 1791 that the rights were. Later, on 15 December 1941, the Bill of Rights Day at Franklin Roosevelt (the president).

Bill of Rights

Amendment I: It was for the free exercise of religion, freedom for complaints in the air, right to petition and freedom of expression for the individual and the press.

Congress should not enforce a law establishing religion, or prohibiting the free service or abridging the freedom of speech or the press or human rights peacefully and petition the Government for a compensation claims.

Amendment II: still controversial, this right to defend freedom and to own a gun.

A good militia, which are necessary for the security of a free State, the right of man and bear arms, shall not be violated.

Amendment III: Prohibition against quartering of troops without the permission of the owners.

No soldier in time of peace geviertelt in each house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV: inadequate protection search and seizure.

The human right to secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, it is unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and is not guaranteed, but probable cause by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place, the search should be, and the persons or things, it should be exploited.

Amendment V: prohibition of confiscation of private property without compensation by the owner or the approval, protection against double jeopardy, the right to a fair trial before a jury.

No person can to raise funds for a response, or other famous crimes, unless, on a charge or a Grand Jury, except in the case of land or sea, or in the militia in the practices of war or public danger, nor any person for the same offense twice in jeopardy of life or body, nor shall be compelled in a criminal proceeding as a witness against himself nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, are still private property, for the public, without just compensation.

Amendment VI: Right to a speedy way of public law, with the witnesses against the accused. Right to defend itself.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused have a right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and the District of crime must be held in the region is determined primarily by the law, and ” be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation with the witnesses against him, the process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and get the support of advisors for his defense.

Amendment VII: Civil range jury, by general laws, and responsibility.

In costumes of the common law, if the value of the controversy, more than twenty dollars, the right to consideration by the jury, not fact, tried by a jury, is still in another jurisdiction of States united, as under the rules of law.

Amendment VIII: prohibition of excess deposit and protection against cruel and unusual.

Excessive caution is not necessary, or for fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment.

Amendment IX: Protection of rights not specifically mentioned in the Bill of Rights “, but as prescribed to humans.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be denied that others denigrate or humans.

Amendment X: no booking branches of government and people of the State and people, as enshrined in the Constitution.

The powers of the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited, which allows states, are only available for States and / or to humans.

Between 1795 and 1992, 17 were in the “Bill of Rights”. Straight above shows what the founding fathers of America believed that the ethics of all citizens. Fourteen copies of the Bill of Rights “were made, one for the Confederation and one for each of the thirteen countries of origin. At the time of the Bill of Rights “in Independence Hall, Washington DC.

First, the Imperial: Chalmers Johnson, a former CIA agent, says in his book Nemesis: The Carter administration deliberately provoked the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan … .. 1996, in his memoirs, l former CIA Director Robert Gates acknowledged that the U.S. Secret Service began using the anti-Soviet Mujahedin guerrillas did the invasion of Russia, but six months before President Carter …. aims to provoke an intervention by the Soviet army … … … .. … … to bind. Attaching the USSR. “is an advanced military in Afghanistan, efforts to link the United States as the USSR?

Obama foresees a U.S. military in Afghanistan, efforts at least five years in a country of more than 50% of Iraq to the environment and population. NATO allies are in the chip size and commitment and often their base camp. A serious U.S. military efforts in chains at least 250,000 troops in Afghanistan / Pakistan. If America were not able to meet other challenges, including as a result of its commitment to protect Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Israel, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Iran , deterrence against use of nuclear weapons program in support of Pakistan to the brink of collapse, etc. ..

The invasion of Iraq can be justified, Imperial reasons, because it is strategically located in the largest concentration of oil in the world. Afghanistan does not have comparable resources, one of the poorest countries, no industry, little agriculture, rugged terrain, the land of bandits and corruption.

The adventure does not come from a non-imperial perspective. Obama said: “The country is still a base for terrorists who want to kill most of our employees, as they may.” None of the 19 people committed to the September 11th tragedy criminal or Afghan Taliban. Fifteen of them were Saudi. There was no Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, more training camps. Osama bin Laden, and what remains of his team is hiding somewhere in the desert of Pakistan. Al Qaeda is scattered and disorganized. Yes, more than 19 clubs to infiltrate the United States and kill Americans, but sending an army in Afghanistan is not to prevent such an offense. Indeed, the war in Afghanistan hyperszenische is rather for us against another September 11th.

Jerome Grossman is a former member of Democratic National Committee, retired chairman of the Massachusetts Envelope Company Chairman Emeritus of the Council for a world, author of Relentless Liberal, one can express his opinion on www.relentlessliberal.com

Someone regularly working very hard for us, we have yet another war, basically unprecedented human dignity is once maimed and killed, and the rest thoroughly angry. Count to intensify these efforts and, in all probability, North Korea or Iran instead of Iraq as Buhmann-of-the-moment.

The provision on the sub-to-Talk or terrorize some of us into a war, we do really can be quite remarkable because we have seen a short time ago with Iraq, where it was clear at low almost from the beginning that the decision of war and was looking for reasons for what is already decided.

However, a tireless propaganda scare any rush to half of the dead, some exaggerations and difficult of proof and some terrorist incidents in time, turn to overcome the natural reluctance of men to burn human skin that he has never met. These things are always in the past.

War is a game, that no nation ever won. It is quite a criminal – murder, violence, intimidation, theft and vandalism are not the modus operandi of dignity, but the men in the jurisdiction of the sentence, the man of ill will towards in relation to its surroundings.

Show me someone who thinks a war is what is trying to do and for others, and I’ll show you a crime, a man with crimes, he preferred the rest of us not – or if we can not recognize, for malicious violations of our basic decency that they are. Remember this the next time a little crazy, regardless of nationality, or the presidential election of that position and tries to us for the war: you’re a man with the crime.

It is no coincidence that the individuals and criminal groups, including the agenda, the oppression and inequality of honest citizens who thrive and grow strongly in the war and its consequences. This, of course, is why they work so hard for the rest of us to fight against these wars.

The problem is, we can not secure because the destructive force of raw materials to the disposal of people pushed into madness that if the radioactive dust to the level of the next one, whether it be left at the life to find someone who has “won”.

Nobody, of course, is to recognize the war. Few of us are stupid enough to believe that war is a lot of fun, especially those who happen to a file. Only the insane criminal law regarding children as a dismemberment funny to fine the implementation of human ties. And outside of an application for asylum in the chaos, flattened cities, Fallout or charred corpses product fit for human efforts.

How do we always wind plays with varying degrees of enthusiasm, a game, none of us playing?

The answer is that someone wanting war, without which it could not happen. The war in Iraq is our last example: there are groups in the United States and the war in Iraq, who wanted and very difficult to get what they wanted.

Someone has to work, in general, very difficult to convince others that the human community in an orgy of blood-letting or any Smashing good people have worked long and hard at our “only option” or only the solution. ”

The fact that someone is always a criminal action, blame, at least the incentive for the millions of good men, violence against another, and worse, against another child. And if people, promotion, lawyer and engineer an attack on one nation over another, you notice that the ears in the crime. With my crime offenses against the laws of their own people, including fraud, embezzlement, coordinating rigging, human rights, killings and so on. The problem is that we do not consider people: We tend to love the place.

Receives and some Bozo said: “No good trying to reason with the dirty dogs! Gotta We ship the weapon and some boats/marines/B52s Knock them democracy!”

The correct response: “Okay, PAL, our laws, you’ve broken?

War is a product of criminal activity, or by that person or that group, disappointment, fear-mongering, and so on, millions of honest people who are not in conflict with another.

For someone that occur, we must ensure that justice and the negation of man, in recognition of his kinship with his fellows.

Good Men, after all, you must still struggling with his own wickedness, to fighting among others. Are not always good men profit from war: it is a criminal enterprise, developed by criminals or the strengthening of criminals.

The phenomenon of war, the causes are not secret. But there are some who, like any other to emerge.

Of modern national and global economy on a single error dysfunction: the money we have our resources for the exchange is in fact not money but debt. Banks create money from nothing and they give to governments, businesses and individuals, which means “money.”

The money is to pay back the interest and almost all the money in circulation. The money is circulating, that the national authorities, and the global economy so that the credit granting process to exist. It was withdrawn from circulation of the debt repaid.

The existence of the money depends on the existence of the debt. More money, we want to have in circulation, more debt, we have to support it.

Debt is high, more money Prosper lender because of the continual flow of interest payments that: There is interest on a debt that their profits.

The banking sector, their head of the powerful dynasty of lending money elite, therefore has an interest that are not in the attainment of capacity to pay, but in the care and development of the general debt.

The system is manipulated to the advantage that the sector of the economy with money in the form of loans paid. The privilege of creating money and power to decide what to credit, access to money, book in the hands of private capital gain lender in the vicinity of absolute power, and makes it convenient for all purposes of a power Echelon Senior governments.

When the economy grow, they need more money, too, in our system based on debt, the largest economy in addition, for in the case of debt. It is not surprising that the largest economy in the world, the United States is by far the most indebted.

Government, businesses and private loans, for a review of the quality movement. This system is a trap, because it is impossible for the economy as a whole to get out of debt more than people do in their so hard to do. This is a man with impossible paradox: the only way to achieve the overall reduction in economic activity to zero!

In addition, debt heights, when the economy out of recession, because money is borrowed into circulation in cases of interest. It is to pay and when it is, interest is added to ensure that more money from the movement of third-party funds outstanding at the beginning. The deficit is due to another, larger round of borrowing. If the money in the banking sector plus interest a grand tour of the loan is necessary to replace it. Thus, borrowing and the amount of debt, to be considered by government, industry and consumers, ratchet inexorably upward.

Public borrowing is an important component of money supply and national debt for money for the economy. The national debt has tended to ratchet up and in an economy of debt without increasing the public debt is essential.

Governments, the economy with money by borrowing and expenditure on projects. Since the government projects, he performs in the general circulation and thus the money supply. The debt will be repaid in case of interest by the taxation of citizens. It is the process by which all the people in debt in order to ensure the money circulating in the economy. The citizen pays the debt of taxes.

Company works closely with the government within the nation military-industrial complex are able, in effect, the purchasing power of consumers cut off the source, the reception is finalized, it is the government . They are other advantages that the power companies in the manufacture and delivery to the army in close collaboration with the banking sector, the granting of credit.

New money into the economy through military spending to an increase in the number of tanks, missiles and so forth. However, this does not add to the economy WEALTH: This is not an improvement in material conditions of consumers, the things he can win. The addition of new prices for the economy without an increase in products and services, consumers can take advantage of the inflation pressure. Military spending, thus pushing inflation upwards. Increased taxes borrowing pushes up.

War and preparations for war is deeply advantage for businesses, the production of weapons and other war material in respect of goods. The war and the threat of war is profound benefits for the banking sector, because war is expensive. Governments in the war or fear of some enemies are forced to rent to finance the war effort. War-stricken country are forced to rent, to repair and rebuild.

The banking sector, its position as a lender to ensure that governments of the urgency in making funds available, the banking sector is able, if they profoundly affect government policy, by its own policy for the credit, the criteria for granting of credit and further away.

In an economy of debt, in other words, the government can not control its own destiny.

The debt of the money creates a hidden force Echelon senior with the government. And that democracy in a farce.